- From: Mukul Gandhi <gandhi.mukul@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2020 19:41:41 +0530
- To: "xmlschema-dev@w3.org" <xmlschema-dev@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CABuuzNMWASqvRWSdEGnpph0dySCjMuZsVVKkdJ68Qe=YvPgjsw@mail.gmail.com>
Hi all, I was not sure, where to discuss this issue, and thought that this list would be fine to discuss this. I've been reading this section, https://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema11-1/#sec-cvc-elt from the XSD 1.1 spec. This says within this section, <quote> Informally, an element is locally valid against an element declaration when: 1. ... 2. ... 3. Any xsi:nil attribute on the element obeys the rules. The element is allowed to have an xsi:nil attribute only if the element is declared nillable, and xsi:nil = 'true' is allowed only if the element itself is empty. If the element declaration specifies a fixed value for the element, xsi:nil='true' will make the element invalid. 4. ... </quote> On the point number 3. cited above, the first phrase says 'Any xsi:nil attribute on the element obeys the rules.'. Perhaps this phrase could have been written as following, 'Any xsi:nil attribute on the element obeys following rules.'. i.e this is a minor editorial suggestion to improve the English grammar of the cited phrase. -- Regards, Mukul Gandhi http://member.acm.org/~mukulgandhi
Received on Monday, 27 January 2020 14:12:01 UTC