- From: Timothy W. Cook <tim@mlhim.org>
- Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2015 12:04:04 -0300
- To: "C. M. Sperberg-McQueen" <cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com>
- Cc: XMLSchema-dev <xmlschema-dev@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CA+=OU3XjFB0L+POK=NERxmEm6sOF_7ezMCmG8T7Our6DjA=4_g@mail.gmail.com>
On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 11:27 AM, C. M. Sperberg-McQueen < cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com> wrote: > I think there are two things you may mean here; one of them is true. > > ... > > The only assertions > which would be evaluated for the xsd:complexType element which defines > R would be those in the schema for XSD schema documents. And in the > current version of the XSD schema for XSD schema documents, there are no > assertions. > > Thank you. This is where I made my mistake in understanding. Am I correct in that Schematron will not solve this problem as well? >From your description, it sounds as if the 'issuer' and 'assignor' elements > in the XML document are conveying no information: the values for each > can be calculated from the value of 'id-name'. If this is so, then the > simplest > way to address your problem is not to solve it but to dissolve it by > removing the redundancy from the design. > > I can see that this would be the solution from a perspective of the way schemas are commonly used. However, I am solving a larger problem and not a specific implementation issue. Again, thank you very much for the insight. Cheers, Tim -- ============================================ Timothy Cook LinkedIn Profile:http://www.linkedin.com/in/timothywaynecook MLHIM http://www.mlhim.org
Received on Saturday, 21 March 2015 15:04:32 UTC