- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2013 13:56:09 +0000
- To: Mukul Gandhi <gandhi.mukul@gmail.com>
- Cc: George Cristian Bina <george@oxygenxml.com>, xmlschema-dev@w3.org
Mukul Gandhi writes:
> Hi George,
> The XSD 1.1 spec at the same place mentions only this,
>
> <quote>
> 1.2 It resolves to a <schema> element information item in a well-formed
> information set.
> </quote>
>
> The 1.1 spec doesn't say "which in turn corresponds to a valid schema."
>
> I think, with an XSD 1.1 processor test.xsd would correspond to a valid
> schema. With both XSD 1.1 and 1.0, m.xsd in isolation would be invalid
> (since the element reference, <xs:element ref="a"/> within it cannot be
> resolved).
Not so -- see my response.
ht
--
Henry S. Thompson, School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh
10 Crichton Street, Edinburgh EH8 9AB, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail from me _always_ has a .sig like this -- mail without it is forged spam]
Received on Tuesday, 12 February 2013 13:56:37 UTC