- From: G. Ken Holman <gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com>
- Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 12:38:05 -0500
- To: xmlschema-dev@w3.org
At 2012-01-10 16:01 +0000, Michael Kay wrote: >I suspect that some parsers interpret the presence of a <DOCTYPE> >declaration as an instruction to perform DTD validation, Precisely. I could analyze that that is what was wrong, but I have no guidance from the documentation on how to get my users running command-line scripts to turn off DTD validation but preserve the entity processing. Hence my post to the list. BTW, I've had no problems with Saxon performing the validation exactly as I need, but the old (ancient) version of 9SA that I have doesn't appear to return a non-zero return code on a validation error. Reading the invocation arguments in the help provided when no arguments are supplied doesn't appear to offer any way to impact the return code. Thanks for confirming my analysis of the situation. My only issue is that I'm using all these tools from the command line and not from inside a program and so I am limited to what can be offered from and to a script. . . . . . . . . . . . . Ken -- Contact us for world-wide XML consulting and instructor-led training Free 5-hour video lecture: XSLT/XPath 1.0 & 2.0 http://ude.my/uoui9h Crane Softwrights Ltd. http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/x/ G. Ken Holman mailto:gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com Google+ profile: https://plus.google.com/116832879756988317389/about Legal business disclaimers: http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/legal
Received on Tuesday, 10 January 2012 17:41:04 UTC