- From: Karl Stubsjoen <kstubs@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 21:18:11 -0700
- To: Mukul Gandhi <gandhi.mukul@gmail.com>
- Cc: xmlschema-dev@w3.org
Hi Mukul, I'm trying to stick with 1.0 standards. If there is not a 1.0 solution than I think I must define a new child element of description. This is what I am doing now. Thanks, Karl.. On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 8:40 PM, Mukul Gandhi <gandhi.mukul@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Karl, > One way is to use the type alternative construct from XML Schema > 1.1. Here's probably something we may be able to do for this use case > (this is untested), > > <xs:schema xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"> > > <xs:element name="description" type="xs:anyType"> > <xs:alternative test="@isExt = true()" type="EXT_formInputTypes"/> > <xs:alternative type="SEQ_TYPE"/> > </xs:element> > > <xs:complexType name="EXT_formInputTypes"> > <xs:complexContent> > <xs:extension base="formInputTypes"> > <xs:attribute name="isExt" type="xs:boolean" default="1"/> > </xs:extension> > </xs:complexContent> > </xs:complexType> > > <xs:complexType name="SEQ_TYPE"> > <xs:sequence> > <xs:element name="column" type="COL_TYPE"/> <!-- COL_TYPE is > undefined. could be xs:string for e.g --> > </xs:sequence> > <xs:attribute name="isExt" type="xs:boolean"/> > </xs:complextype> > > </xs:schema> > > As per this example, by default the type of "description" is > EXT_formInputTypes. But if we add an attribute isExt = 0 (false) to > "description" in the instance document, the type of "description" > would be SEQ_TYPE. > > On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 7:07 AM, Karl Stubsjoen <kstubs@gmail.com> wrote: >> I have an element "description", who should either extend the >> complexType "formInputTypes" or contain a sequence of "column" >> elements. Is this possible? >> >> -- >> Karl Stubsjoen >> MeetScoresOnline.com >> (602) 845-0006 > > > > > > -- > Regards, > Mukul Gandhi > -- Karl Stubsjoen MeetScoresOnline.com (602) 845-0006
Received on Thursday, 16 June 2011 04:18:47 UTC