- From: Avinash Nagabhushan <avinash.sit@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 11:40:01 +0530
- To: Mukul Gandhi <gandhi.mukul@gmail.com>
- Cc: Noah Mendelsohn <nrm@arcanedomain.com>, xmlschema-dev@w3.org
Thanks a lot for the responses, These comments helped me a lot. Thanks, Avinash K N On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 10:19 PM, Mukul Gandhi <gandhi.mukul@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Noah, > > On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 9:42 PM, Noah Mendelsohn <nrm@arcanedomain.com> wrote: >> I'm not sure I agree with that. It depends on what you're optimizing for, >> what tools you're using, etc. There are certainly circumstances in which >> modeling the tree semantics of the information (the hierarchy of >> departments) directly in the tree of elements is the natural thing to do. It >> certainly seems to make processing with tools such as XPath & friends much >> easier. > > I thought that the schema I proposed, defined a good *content model* > (it's likely better normalized than what was proposed originally by > Avinash). > > I agree with your other points. > > > > > -- > Regards, > Mukul Gandhi >
Received on Wednesday, 13 July 2011 06:11:12 UTC