- From: Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com>
- Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 09:57:40 +0100
- To: Nicolas Voillot <n.voillot@bbsconception.com>
- CC: xmlschema-dev@w3.org
Received on Tuesday, 12 October 2010 08:58:10 UTC
"2009-09-09" is valid for xs:date but not for xs:dateTime - the time part of the value is mandatory. Michael Kay Saxonica On 12/10/2010 8:49 AM, Nicolas Voillot wrote: > Hello, > > I'm writting some xsd and xml related files and I encounter some > problems when I try to validate dateTime nodes with your validator > (http://www.w3.org/2001/03/webdata/xsv) : when the dateTime value is > writted with the lexical form (for example "2009-09-09T00:00:00"), the > validator is ok, but when the dateTime value is writted with the > canonical form (for example "2009-09-09", see > http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-xmlschema-2-20010502/#dateTime-lexical-repr > and next paragraph), the validator is not ok. > I have this message : > Invalid per cvc-complex-type.1.2.2: element content failed type check: > 2009-09-09 is not a valid dateTime literal > > Could you explain my error or correct the problem ? > > Best regards, > Nicolas Voillot BBS Conception > n.voillot@bbsconception.com <mailto:n.voillot@bbsconception.com> > Tel. : 03 58 05 60 19 12 rue Colbert - BP 382 > 63 010 Clermont-Ferrand Cedex 1 > Tel. : 04 73 34 96 64 > Fax : 03 57 75 63 54 > www.bbsconception.com <http://www.bbsconception.com> >
Received on Tuesday, 12 October 2010 08:58:10 UTC