- From: Pete Cordell <petexmldev@codalogic.com>
- Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 09:46:32 -0000
- To: "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com>, "Kevin Braun" <kbraun@obj-sys.com>
- Cc: <xmlschema-dev@w3.org>
Thanks Michael. I agree with your assessment that it's "legal, by mistake". It seems so clearly mistaken to me that it's something that ought to have been fixed by an errata. The cat's out the bag now though. Pete Cordell Codalogic Ltd Interface XML to C++ the easy way using C++ XML data binding to convert XSD schemas to C++ classes. Visit http://codalogic.com/lmx/ or http://www.xml2cpp.com for more info ----- Original Message ----- From: "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> To: "Kevin Braun" <kbraun@obj-sys.com> Cc: "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@codalogic.com>; <xmlschema-dev@w3.org> Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2010 9:15 PM Subject: Re: Extension of xs:simpleContent > > On 17/11/2010 18:27, Kevin Braun wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I believe under XSD 1.0 it is valid but under XSD 1.1 it would not be. >> See http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xmlschema-dev/2009Feb/0040.html >> and the subsequent discussion; I believe it is the same question. >> > > And for the record, this points to > > http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5943 > http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6600 > > which contain further discussion of this topic. > > Michael Kay > Saxonica > >
Received on Thursday, 18 November 2010 09:47:31 UTC