- From: bharath <bharathkr@huawei.com>
- Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 20:52:49 +0530
- To: 'Michael Kay' <mike@saxonica.com>, 'Pete Cordell' <petexmldev@codalogic.com>, xmlschema-dev@w3.org
- Cc: rajithr@huawei.com, arathikarki@huawei.com, ksrilakshmi@huawei.com
Hi Pete Cordell/ Michek Kay Thanks for your reply. Can you please tell me where I can find this limitation of <all> extension in xml schema specification. Thanks and Regards, Bharath. -----Original Message----- From: xmlschema-dev-request@w3.org [mailto:xmlschema-dev-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Michael Kay Sent: Monday, November 30, 2009 8:41 PM To: 'Pete Cordell'; 'bharath'; xmlschema-dev@w3.org Cc: rajithr@huawei.com; arathikarki@huawei.com Subject: RE: Reg. <all> model group extension > > I don't believe you are allowed to extend xs:all in XSD 1.0. > This has been relaxed in the upcoming 1.1. Correct (thanks for spotting this, Pete). After fixing a couple of typos (bad XML end tags), I get the following from Saxon 9.2 running with -xsdversion:1.0: Error on line 15 of test.xsd: The type DerivedType is defined with xs:all so (in XSD 1.0) it cannot be derived by extension from a non-empty type Schema processing failed: The schema is invalid but with -xsdversion:1.1 I get: Schema checking successful. Regards, Michael Kay http://www.saxonica.com/ http://twitter.com/michaelhkay
Received on Monday, 30 November 2009 15:23:58 UTC