- From: Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com>
- Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 14:06:16 -0000
- To: "'bharath'" <bharathkr@huawei.com>, <xmlschema-dev@w3.org>
- Cc: <rajithr@huawei.com>, <arathikarki@huawei.com>
Received on Monday, 30 November 2009 14:06:51 UTC
It looks OK to me by visual inspection - I haven't tried running it. Why do you doubt that it's OK? Regards, Michael Kay http://www.saxonica.com/ http://twitter.com/michaelhkay _____ From: xmlschema-dev-request@w3.org [mailto:xmlschema-dev-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of bharath Sent: 30 November 2009 13:55 To: xmlschema-dev@w3.org Cc: rajithr@huawei.com; arathikarki@huawei.com Subject: Reg. <all> model group extension Hi All, I have one doubt reg. <all> model group extension. i have the following schema. <schema targetNamespace="testschema" xmlns:tns="testschema"> <complexType name="BaseType"> <all> <element name="a1" type="string"/> <element name="a2" type="string"/> </all> </complexType> <complexType name="DerivedType"> <complexContent> <extension base="tns:BaseType"> <all> <element name="a3" type="string"/> </all> <extension> </complexContent> <complexType> </schema> Is this extension of the <all> model group correct?? If not please provide me the reason. Please reply me as soon as possible. Thanks and Regards, Bharath.
Received on Monday, 30 November 2009 14:06:51 UTC