- From: Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com>
- Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 14:06:16 -0000
- To: "'bharath'" <bharathkr@huawei.com>, <xmlschema-dev@w3.org>
- Cc: <rajithr@huawei.com>, <arathikarki@huawei.com>
Received on Monday, 30 November 2009 14:06:51 UTC
It looks OK to me by visual inspection - I haven't tried running it.
Why do you doubt that it's OK?
Regards,
Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/
http://twitter.com/michaelhkay
_____
From: xmlschema-dev-request@w3.org [mailto:xmlschema-dev-request@w3.org] On
Behalf Of bharath
Sent: 30 November 2009 13:55
To: xmlschema-dev@w3.org
Cc: rajithr@huawei.com; arathikarki@huawei.com
Subject: Reg. <all> model group extension
Hi All,
I have one doubt reg. <all> model group extension.
i have the following schema.
<schema targetNamespace="testschema" xmlns:tns="testschema">
<complexType name="BaseType">
<all>
<element name="a1" type="string"/>
<element name="a2" type="string"/>
</all>
</complexType>
<complexType name="DerivedType">
<complexContent>
<extension base="tns:BaseType">
<all>
<element name="a3" type="string"/>
</all>
<extension>
</complexContent>
<complexType>
</schema>
Is this extension of the <all> model group correct??
If not please provide me the reason. Please reply me as soon as possible.
Thanks and Regards,
Bharath.
Received on Monday, 30 November 2009 14:06:51 UTC