Re: Naming in Override Constraints and Semantics

Thanks Henry.  Just done.

As I know the WG is not looking for extra work I thought I'd post to the 
public list so that members have a low procedure way to object to the 
comment if I've really missed the point!  That said, I think it's a simple 
and useful change to make.

Thanks again,

Pete.
--
=============================================
Pete Cordell
Codalogic Ltd
Interface XML to C++ the easy way using XML C++
data binding to convert XSD schemas to C++ classes.
Visit http://codalogic.com/lmx/ or http://www.xml2cpp.com
for more info
=============================================

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Henry S. Thompson" <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
To: "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@codalogic.com>
Cc: <xmlschema-dev@w3.org>
Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 2009 9:40 AM
Subject: Re: Naming in Override Constraints and Semantics



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Requests for changes to the spec should go to
www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org or into Buzilla -- they may get
overlooked if they are only sent here.

I'd suggest you reduce the length of your requested new names, to,
say, Dold and Dnew. . .

ht
- -- 
       Henry S. Thompson, School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh
                         Half-time member of W3C Team
      10 Crichton Street, Edinburgh EH8 9AB, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
                Fax: (44) 131 651-1426, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
                       URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged 
spam]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFK+oaRkjnJixAXWBoRAjCyAJ9xWKNKnDOdCgsVHifHkSH+r5oDdwCcCsMy
6PycvCIKjDgwQwoHHLQRtSM=
=045d
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Received on Wednesday, 11 November 2009 15:02:48 UTC