- From: C. M. Sperberg-McQueen <cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com>
- Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 22:31:29 -0400
- To: Pete Cordell <petexmldev@codalogic.com>
- Cc: "C. M. Sperberg-McQueen" <cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com>, <xmlschema-dev@w3.org>
On 27 Jul 2009, at 11:01 , Pete Cordell wrote: > In XSD 1.1 section 2.2 it says: > > Note: At the abstract level, there is no requirement that the > components of a schema share a ·target namespace·. Any schema for > use in ·assessment· of documents containing names from more than one > namespace will of necessity include components with different > ·target namespaces·. This contrasts with the situation at the level > of the XML representation of components, in which each schema > document contributes definitions and declarations to a single target > namespace. > > Is the last sentence still true anymore? It certainly needs to be revised. I think that it's still a reasonably good first approximation of the situation, but it's not true as stated. Thank you for making us aware of it. Michael Sperberg-McQueeen -- **************************************************************** * C. M. Sperberg-McQueen, Black Mesa Technologies LLC * http://www.blackmesatech.com * http://cmsmcq.com/mib * http://balisage.net ****************************************************************
Received on Wednesday, 29 July 2009 06:18:51 UTC