- From: Costello, Roger L. <costello@mitre.org>
- Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 18:10:52 -0400
- To: "xmlschema-dev@w3.org" <xmlschema-dev@w3.org>
Perhaps I'm not understanding. Shouldn't the declaration for restriction be this: <!ELEMENT xsd:restriction ( xsd:annotation?, ( xsd:openContent?, (xsd:all | xsd:choice | xsd:sequence | xsd:group)? | (xsd:simpleType?, xsd:facet*) ), (xsd:attribute | xsd:attributeGroup)*, xsd:anyAttribute? )> Note the addition of an optional xsd:openContent prior to (xsd:all ...) Is this correct? /Roger > -----Original Message----- > From: C. M. Sperberg-McQueen [mailto:cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com] > Sent: Friday, July 03, 2009 12:48 PM > To: Costello, Roger L. > Cc: C. M. Sperberg-McQueen; xmlschema-dev@w3.org > Subject: Re: [XML Schema 1.1] The <restriction> element is > not declared in the DTD for XML Schema 1.1 > > > On 3 Jul 2009, at 10:09 , Costello, Roger L. wrote: > > > > > > > Shouldn't openContent be in there? > > > Er, Roger, we are talking about DTDs here, remember? > > DTDs don't have wildcards, apart from the ANY keyword, > which is not useful as a substitute for open content. > > -- > **************************************************************** > * C. M. Sperberg-McQueen, Black Mesa Technologies LLC > * http://www.blackmesatech.com > * http://cmsmcq.com/mib > * http://balisage.net > **************************************************************** > > > > >
Received on Friday, 3 July 2009 22:11:30 UTC