- From: Costello, Roger L. <costello@mitre.org>
- Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 18:10:52 -0400
- To: "xmlschema-dev@w3.org" <xmlschema-dev@w3.org>
Perhaps I'm not understanding. Shouldn't the declaration for restriction be this:
<!ELEMENT xsd:restriction
( xsd:annotation?,
(
xsd:openContent?, (xsd:all | xsd:choice | xsd:sequence | xsd:group)?
|
(xsd:simpleType?, xsd:facet*)
),
(xsd:attribute | xsd:attributeGroup)*,
xsd:anyAttribute?
)>
Note the addition of an optional xsd:openContent prior to (xsd:all ...)
Is this correct?
/Roger
> -----Original Message-----
> From: C. M. Sperberg-McQueen [mailto:cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com]
> Sent: Friday, July 03, 2009 12:48 PM
> To: Costello, Roger L.
> Cc: C. M. Sperberg-McQueen; xmlschema-dev@w3.org
> Subject: Re: [XML Schema 1.1] The <restriction> element is
> not declared in the DTD for XML Schema 1.1
>
>
> On 3 Jul 2009, at 10:09 , Costello, Roger L. wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > Shouldn't openContent be in there?
>
>
> Er, Roger, we are talking about DTDs here, remember?
>
> DTDs don't have wildcards, apart from the ANY keyword,
> which is not useful as a substitute for open content.
>
> --
> ****************************************************************
> * C. M. Sperberg-McQueen, Black Mesa Technologies LLC
> * http://www.blackmesatech.com
> * http://cmsmcq.com/mib
> * http://balisage.net
> ****************************************************************
>
>
>
>
>
Received on Friday, 3 July 2009 22:11:30 UTC