- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 13:56:28 +0000
- To: Michael Glavassevich <mrglavas@ca.ibm.com>
- Cc: "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com>, "'Christian Roth'" <roth@visualclick.de>, "'XML Schema Development List'" <xmlschema-dev@w3.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Michael Glavassevich writes:
>> <xs:attributeGroup name="standard">
>> <xs:attributeGroup ref="v1:standard"/>
>> <xs:attribute ref="v2:status"/>
>> <xs:anyAttribute namespace="##other" processContents="lax"/>
>> </xs:attributeGroup>
>
> Assuming v1 and v2 are bound to different namespaces I don't believe this
> is legal [1] (see clause 2 of Attribute Group Definition Representation OK)
> in XML Schema 1.0. I'm pretty sure in Xerces we emit an error because the
> intersection [2] of the two negations is not expressible.
You're right, of course -- the discussion of this example arose in the
context of XML Schema 1.1, where the intersection _is_ expressible.
ht
- --
Henry S. Thompson, School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh
Half-time member of W3C Team
10 Crichton Street, Edinburgh EH8 9AB, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
Fax: (44) 131 651-1426, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFJHYOMkjnJixAXWBoRAhznAKCALrhGY/uARI19hLA+W4AHLxX2jACfWDKH
n959IagKYNM/Wu7A9cir/AY=
=Pvxr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Friday, 14 November 2008 13:57:16 UTC