- From: Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com>
- Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 12:52:05 -0000
- To: "'Christian Roth'" <roth@visualclick.de>, "'XML Schema Development List'" <xmlschema-dev@w3.org>
> Thank you! Is the "surprising rule" you refer to the one under > > §3.4.2-"XML Representation Summary: complexType Element > Information Item"-"Complex Type Definition with simple > content Schema Component"-2.2.1 Yes. > > (don't know if there is a more concise way of referring to > that specific document location)? The structure has been improved in XSD 1.1 to make referencing much easier. > > Yes, I would have expected a union in the same way single > attribute definitions form a union, since my personal view up > to now on "anyAttribute" was that it's just a slightly more > generalized "attribute". Obviously, it's not, but treated > quite differently. Haven't thought on this long enough, but: > are there use cases for namespace intersections? I personally can't see any logic behind the current design, but it appears there are reasonable people who can. Michael Kay http://www.saxonica.com/
Received on Tuesday, 11 November 2008 13:06:39 UTC