- From: Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com>
- Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 16:48:43 +0100
- To: "'Pete Cordell'" <petexmldev@codalogic.com>, "'Suresh Joshee'" <sjoshee@gmail.com>
- Cc: <xmlschema-dev@w3.org>
> > Actually I wanted to describe mutations in XML Schema > preferably using Z > > notations. To describe mutations, I need formal > description of language > > preferably in BNF (EBNF). Is it good idea to use DTD for > the XML Schema at > > the start point and add more constraint rules that is not > included in DTD definitions. I don't really understand what you want to do, but I would suggest that you model schemas at the level of a collection of schema components, and not at the level of the grammar for schema documents. This will make your life much simpler by removing many superficial variations. Michael Kay http://www.saxonica.com/
Received on Friday, 6 June 2008 15:49:26 UTC