- From: Anthony B. Coates (Work) <abcoates.work@yahoo.co.uk>
- Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 08:49:45 -0000
- To: xmlschema-dev@w3.org
On Tue, 29 Jan 2008 16:39:01 -0000, Bob Schloss <rschloss@us.ibm.com> wrote: > To ground this in some of the work my colleagues and I are doing at IBM > Research, we have developed strategies so that XPath addressing can be > used against any kind of data, without it necessarily being converted as > a > whole into XML in advance. We call this our Virtual XML work, and you > can > find an introduction to that work at > http://www.research.ibm.com/journal/sj/452/rose.pdf . See a trial, known > as Virtual XML Garden, on the IBM alphaWorks site: > http://www.alphaworks.ibm.com/tech/virtualxml . > In this case, the XML Schema is definitely being used as a logical model. Nomenclature is a funny old thing. I would argue that you don't access data via a logical model, you access it via a physical model. That physical model might be virtualised in some sense, as it is with the Virtual XML Garden; there might be multiple physical models, and some physical models might be derived from other physical models (e.g. Java/C# classes "compiled" from XML schemas). XML is a generic data representation, but it is still a physical representation. Cheers, Tony. -- Anthony B. Coates London, UK UK: +44 (20) 8816 7700, US: +1 (239) 344 7700 Mobile/Cell: +44 (79) 0543 9026 abcoates.work@yahoo.co.uk
Received on Wednesday, 30 January 2008 21:08:08 UTC