W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xmlschema-dev@w3.org > April 2008

Re: UPA or not UPA violation?

From: Florent Georges <lists@fgeorges.org>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 13:52:07 +0200 (CEST)
To: xmlschema-dev@w3.org
Message-ID: <72692.7305.qm@web23003.mail.ird.yahoo.com>

Michael Kay wrote:

> Remember what UPA stands for: unique particle
> attribution. Every child element can be unambiguously
> associated with exactly one particle in the content
> model. If there are no child elements, this is trivially
> true.

  Oh yes, I see my fault: I thought the processor had to know
wether group was used, but the UPA doesn't apply at this
level.  Thank you for the explanation.



Envoyez avec Yahoo! Mail. Une boite mail plus intelligente http://mail.yahoo.fr
Received on Wednesday, 16 April 2008 11:52:46 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 23:15:46 UTC