W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xmlschema-dev@w3.org > April 2008

Re: UPA or not UPA violation?

From: Florent Georges <lists@fgeorges.org>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 13:52:07 +0200 (CEST)
To: xmlschema-dev@w3.org
Message-ID: <72692.7305.qm@web23003.mail.ird.yahoo.com>

Michael Kay wrote:

> Remember what UPA stands for: unique particle
> attribution. Every child element can be unambiguously
> associated with exactly one particle in the content
> model. If there are no child elements, this is trivially
> true.

  Oh yes, I see my fault: I thought the processor had to know
wether group was used, but the UPA doesn't apply at this
level.  Thank you for the explanation.

  Regards,

--drkm




















      _____________________________________________________________________________ 
Envoyez avec Yahoo! Mail. Une boite mail plus intelligente http://mail.yahoo.fr
Received on Wednesday, 16 April 2008 11:52:46 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 23:15:46 UTC