W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xmlschema-dev@w3.org > September 2007

RE: [BULK] Re: Data Modeling

From: Fortuno, Adam <Adam.Fortuno@Metavante.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 11:12:12 -0400
Message-ID: <CED447ECB4C001419947EBF4776E503201A52B4C@ghrintallmsg2.CORPORATE.GHRSYS.AD>
To: "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@tech-know-ware.com>
Cc: <xmlschema-dev@w3.org>


I was looking for a graphical diagramming method.

I understand what you're saying. Thanks none the less!


-----Original Message-----
From: xmlschema-dev-request@w3.org [mailto:xmlschema-dev-request@w3.org]
On Behalf Of Pete Cordell
Sent: Monday, September 17, 2007 9:08 AM
To: Fortuno, Adam; xmlschema-dev@w3.org
Subject: [BULK] Re: Data Modeling
Importance: Low

Are you looking for things like XML Schema, Relax-NG, Schematron and so
Or are you looking for graphical methods?

If the latter, I'm not aware of any formal methods, but a number of
tools do represent schemas using graphical methods. However, in my
experience, in most cases the graphical representations only capture a
fraction of the information you need, and while sufficient for a screen
based representation with which you can click to get more information,
they probably don't translate well into paper based representations.


Pete Cordell
for XML Schema to C++ data binding visit
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Fortuno, Adam" <Adam.Fortuno@Metavante.com>
To: <xmlschema-dev@w3.org>
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2007 3:53 PM
Subject: Data Modeling


Is there a popular notation for modeling a vocabulary? I'm accustom to
ERD's for database data modeling. I tend to use that for data modeling
XML vocabularies, but I want to know if there is a better way to do

Received on Monday, 17 September 2007 15:12:07 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 23:15:44 UTC