W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xmlschema-dev@w3.org > October 2007

Re: optional, but at least one required

From: Virginia Wiswell <vwiswell@verizon.net>
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 15:37:26 -0500
To: "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com>,"'Pete Cordell'" <petexmldev@tech-know-ware.com>, "'Marie Bilde Rasmussen'" <mariebilderas@gmail.com>
Cc: "'Virginia Wiswell'" <vwiswell@verizon.net>, <xmlschema-dev@w3.org>
Message-ID: <web-50635784@aliencamel.com>

That's a pretty straightforward solution. I look forward to using it 

Regarding the previous message, Michael, where does one draw the line 
at including every rule in the schema? Some things are more easily 
done when processing, for sure. But it's good to know that I can't get 
arrested for leaving something out of the schema :)

On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 14:38:13 +0100
  "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> wrote:
>> XSD1.1 is looking at adding an xs:assert schema directive 
>> that includes a set of xpath expressions that a construct 
>> (sequence/choice/etc.) must satisfy.  I would be interested 
>> to know how complicated such an expression for this use-case 
>> would be if anyone cared to submit an example.
> You can write it as
>  <xs:sequence>
>    <xs:element ref="a" minOccurs="0"/>
>    <xs:element ref="b" minOccurs="0"/>
>  </xs:sequence>
>  <xs:assert test="a|b"/>
> Michael Kay
> http://www.saxonica.com/
Received on Thursday, 11 October 2007 20:37:40 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 23:15:44 UTC