- From: Pete Cordell <petexmldev@tech-know-ware.com>
- Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 15:38:39 +0100
- To: "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com>, "'Marie Bilde Rasmussen'" <mariebilderas@gmail.com>
- Cc: "'Virginia Wiswell'" <vwiswell@verizon.net>, <xmlschema-dev@w3.org>
- Original Message From: "Michael Kay"
> <xs:sequence>
> <xs:element ref="a" minOccurs="0"/>
> <xs:element ref="b" minOccurs="0"/>
> </xs:sequence>
> <xs:assert test="a|b"/>
Hum, seems simple enough :-)
And, just to confirm that the simple case does not hide any nasties when
extended up to bigger examples, Marie's case would simply be (ignoring the
specific names):
<xs:assert test="a|b|c|d|e|f|..."/>
BTW - If, in another schema snippet, I wanted either attribute A or element
E, but not both, then my expression would be:
<xs:assert test="@A and fn:not(E) or fn:not(@A) and E"/>
I don't think I can do the following though, because I can't do "...eq 1":
<xs:assert test="op:count(@A|E) eq 1"/>
Is that the case?
Thanks,
Pete.
=============================================
Pete Cordell
Codalogic
for XML Schema to C++ data binding visit
http://www.codalogic.com/lmx/
=============================================
Received on Thursday, 11 October 2007 14:39:07 UTC