- From: Shlomo Yona <S.Yona@F5.com>
- Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2007 03:27:20 -0800
- To: "Henry S. Thompson" <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Cc: "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com>, <xmlschema-dev@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <AB313AF70F994447A667F4D942CA6557068DE14B@excheight.olympus.f5net.com>
Thanks for the example, but I'm yet more confused. What is the meaning of a simpleType child to restriction when restriction has a base attribute? Thanks. Shlomo -----Original Message----- From: Henry S. Thompson [mailto:ht@inf.ed.ac.uk] Sent: Mon 11/12/2007 1:19 PM To: Shlomo Yona Cc: Michael Kay; xmlschema-dev@w3.org Subject: Re: Mixed content and empty content -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Shlomo Yona writes: > Since this is a mixed content then the textual data is not > restricted at all -- can the textual content be further restricted > by derivation even if it is mixed? I mean -- can it be changed to an > xsd:integer? I think not, but I don't know. This _is_ allowed -- it's how the simple types are in principle derivable from anyType. For your example: <xs:complexType name="rtype" mixed="true"/> <xs:element name="root"> <xs:complexType> <xs:simpleContent> <xs:restriction base="rtype"> <xs:simpleType> <xs:restriction base="xs:integer"/> </xs:simpleType> </xs:restriction> </xs:simpleContent> </xs:complexType> </xs:element> ht - -- Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh Half-time member of W3C Team 2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440 Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/ [mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFHODbDkjnJixAXWBoRAp/bAJ0Y7XtuKLuFobuCi/Tn8ArKhC9SIQCdHDJw QK7580vCvyDMhniRmoqdRVQ= =tK7r -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Monday, 12 November 2007 11:28:48 UTC