- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 11:53:29 +0100
- To: Boris Kolpackov <boris@codesynthesis.com>
- Cc: Pete Cordell <petexmldev@tech-know-ware.com>, xmlschema-dev@w3.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Boris Kolpackov writes:
> Any studies to support these numbers? I just did a quick check over
> a bunch of real-world schemas in our repository. Out of 18 schemas,
> 7 are "unqualified" (~40%) and 11 are "qualified" (~60%).
In my collection of schema documents, I find
753 qualified
220 [not specified, defaults to unqualfied]
49 unqualified
ht
- --
Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
Half-time member of W3C Team
2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFGUXopkjnJixAXWBoRAgDzAJ0QB6OWfJyf0ZZ4BHDiXGQuP1U0wQCdH5XQ
00wiF2peR7r20A1j13JrEZo=
=WWCb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Monday, 21 May 2007 10:53:35 UTC