- From: brycenesbitt <bryce1@obviously.com>
- Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 16:59:15 -0700 (PDT)
- To: xmlschema-dev@w3.org
How about something akin to "javax". The ability to insert an extra
attribute to a non-conforming element that says "this is extended beyond the
schema". Then you'd still catch mistakes in a standard type (e.g. "runtal"
when "rental" was meant), but still allow true extensions (e.g. "leasing").
I like the idea of providing an enumeration, even in cases where that's just
a serving suggestion or starting point.
Pete Cordell wrote:
>
>
> One thing I often see are sets of enumerations that are not extensible....
>
> <xs:simpleType name="foo">
> <xs:restriction base="xs:string">
> <xs:pattern value="[a-zA-Z0-0]{3,4}"/>
> <xs:enumeration value="ABC"/>
> <xs:enumeration value="DEFG"/>
> <xs:anyEnumeration/> <!-- New -->
> </xs:restriction>
> </xs:simpleType>
>
>
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Schema-1.1%3A-xs%3AanyEnumeration-considered--tf3415265.html#a10278076
Sent from the w3.org - xmlschema-dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Received on Tuesday, 1 May 2007 23:59:19 UTC