- From: Pete Cordell <petexmldev@tech-know-ware.com>
- Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 16:22:10 -0000
- To: <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>
- Cc: <xmlschema-dev@w3.org>
Original Message From: noah_mendelsohn@us... > Of all the other interesting tradeoffs between RelaxNG > and W3C XML Schemas, I'm a little surprised to see that one suggested as > most significant in determining a choice by the IEEE. Just to clarify, this is the issue that I thought wasn't valid. There were more significant issues in James' message. They've also pointed me at the e-mail: http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/xcon/current/msg01527.html An issue we all know about though. (Actually, it's a working group in the IETF, so may not reflect IETF policy as a whole.) Thanks, Pete. -- ============================================= Pete Cordell Tech-Know-Ware Ltd for XML to C++ data binding visit http://www.tech-know-ware.com/lmx/ http://www.codalogic.com/lmx/ =============================================
Received on Thursday, 22 March 2007 16:22:59 UTC