- From: David Carver <kingargyle@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 10:42:53 -0400
- To: Bryan Rasmussen <BRS@itst.dk>
- CC: Pete Cordell <petexmldev@tech-know-ware.com>, xmlschema-dev@w3.org
Bryan Rasmussen wrote: > > >>> Trouble is, James Clark is one of those people who I would imagine is >>> rarely wrong, so I thought I'd better ask! >>> >> Yes, James Clark is wrong. Of course you need to take a look at the >> date of the email, which is 2002, and we are in 2007 now, so I suspect >> it was accurate at the time it was written. Xerces correctly rejects >> the <bar/> element when validated with the schema example provided. >> > > > Really? It's been probably a full year but I could have sworn the last time I > checked this thing in XSV and in some versions of XMLSpy it validated laxly? > > I believe Xerces default is strict. It is the only way I validate any way. In my industry, lax validation does us no good. Dave
Received on Thursday, 22 March 2007 14:48:27 UTC