- From: Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com>
- Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2007 09:22:17 -0000
- To: "'Boris Kolpackov'" <boris@codesynthesis.com>, <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>
- Cc: <ccodere@ieee.org>, "'Pete Cordell'" <petexmldev@tech-know-ware.com>, <xmlschema-dev@w3.org>
> The main point of using XML Schema for formally specifying > XML vocabularies is to facilitate application > interoperability. I think the smart ones will use the minimal > subset expected from all processors while the not-so-smart > ones will arrive at the same result the hard way. There are > already (mis-)features in XML Schema 1.0 that are avoided > pretty much by everyone (e.g., redefine). On the other hand, it might be that everyone ends up implementing the whole of XPath 2.0 because it's too much of a pain to implement a subset. That's certainly what I intend to do. Michael Kay http://www.saxonica.com/
Received on Sunday, 4 February 2007 09:22:38 UTC