- From: Guillaume Lebleu <gl@brixlogic.com>
- Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2007 16:31:38 -0800
- To: xmlschema-dev@w3.org
Hello, I was wondering if the use case of enumerated complex types had ever come up in this list. I did a quick search and couldn't find anything. Here is what I mean: Let's say I want to define a list of error codes, each having a possible value, an associated severity level and description, which I have specified in the form of a table, and I want to return in an XML message this information in the form of a <Status> aggregate containing a <StatusCode> element, <Severity> element and <Desc> element. This is a realistic use case you can find in industry standards such as IFX and ACORD. One solution would be to use co-constraint rules: if StatusCode is '100' then Severity must be 'Error' and Desc must be 'General Error', but that sounds quite complicated and it wouldn't help the manual edition of a schema-compliant XML document. The alternative solution I'm thinking about would be something similar to the xs:restriction and xs:enumeration used in simpleTypes, but with a value that would essentially be an XML document fragment. I see several advantages to this representation: * It could be leveraged to accelerate the manual edition of XML instances of an XML Schema through code completion: I select one of the enumerations in a drop-down list, just like today XML editors allow me to select an enumerated value from a drop-down list. * It is easier than co-constraint representation for business people to understand and edit. * It might be easier for type checkers to deal with (intuition). Let me know what you think and sorry if this has already been discussed. Guillaume
Received on Thursday, 20 December 2007 00:31:55 UTC