- From: Rich Adili <Rich.Adili@xata.com>
- Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 08:21:12 -0500
- To: "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com>, <xmlschema-dev@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <A0340B4A1C76734798D48BF3F09C620630425B@EXCHVS01.xata.com>
I have to deal with a server that emits the example XML as-is (inner node converted to text), I can't change it. I guess what I wanted was a way to express the relationship without modifying either schema, perhaps by creating a third. Doesn't look feasible. ________________________________ From: Michael Kay [mailto:mike@saxonica.com] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2007 8:02 AM To: Rich Adili; xmlschema-dev@w3.org Subject: RE: Merging schemas Well, at the moment there isn't a hierarchical relationship? I think you're saying you want to modify the definition of DataWrapperNode so that instead of containing a string it contains a DataNode. That sounds like a simple text edit to me. Michael Kay http://www.saxonica.com/ ________________________________ From: xmlschema-dev-request@w3.org [mailto:xmlschema-dev-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Rich Adili Sent: 17 August 2007 13:55 To: Michael Kay; xmlschema-dev@w3.org Subject: RE: Merging schemas Well, neither schema is aware of the hierarchical relationship. ________________________________ From: Michael Kay [mailto:mike@saxonica.com] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2007 7:51 AM To: Rich Adili; xmlschema-dev@w3.org Subject: RE: Merging schemas Unless there's an overlap between the schemas, can't you just combine them using <xs:schema> <xs:include schemaLocation="schemaA.xsd"/> <xs:include schemaLocation="schemaB.xsd"/> </xs:schema> Or have I missed the point? Michael Kay http://www.saxonica.com/ ________________________________ From: xmlschema-dev-request@w3.org [mailto:xmlschema-dev-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Rich Adili Sent: 17 August 2007 13:00 To: xmlschema-dev@w3.org Subject: Merging schemas Hi all, I have to deal with some legacy XML that resembles the example snippet below. For historical reasons they've split the thing in two. The outer bit is in schema A and the inner bit is encoded as text and represented by schema B. (schema A simply defines the DataWrapperNode as a trivial element). <DataWrapperNode><DataNode>yadyada</DataNode></DataWrapperNo de> I would like to run this thing through a code generator and what I need as output is code representing the union of the two. Does this problem have an elegant solution? Rich
Received on Friday, 17 August 2007 13:21:11 UTC