- From: <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 14:53:29 -0400
- To: "Christian Setzkorn" <christian@setzkorn.eu>
- Cc: xmlschema-dev@w3.org
Christian Setzkorn writes:
> PS: I didn't really understand why you use <bob></bob> instead
> of <gender></gender> ... later I would like to use this simple
> type in complex types with complex content model.
No important reason. I had to make some arbitrary assumptions about your
example, and I guessed wrong. So, I was guessing you might have:
<genders>
<bob>1</bob>
<mary>0</mary>
</genders>
but I can see where it's more likely that you'd have:
<person name="bob" gender="1"/>
or
<person>
<name>Bob</name>
<gender>1</gender>
</person>
I think my answer on the type works in any case.
> Many thanks for this. It is exactly what I want.
Terrific. I'm very glad to help.
Noah
--------------------------------------
Noah Mendelsohn
IBM Corporation
One Rogers Street
Cambridge, MA 02142
1-617-693-4036
--------------------------------------
Received on Tuesday, 5 September 2006 19:41:09 UTC