- From: Xan Gregg <xan.gregg@jmp.com>
- Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2006 10:22:19 -0400
- To: XMLSchema-Dev <xmlschema-dev@w3.org>
- Cc: Leo Antoli <Leo.Antoli@Misys.com>
On Oct 17, 2006, at 10:11 AM, Antoli, Leo wrote: > Have you used or you know of some public schema which uses > elementFormDefault="unqualified" ? > > Are there good reasons to use it? Are there good reasons to avoid it? I think there is a technical reason for using uqualified locals: it makes allows derivation by restriction by types in other namespaces. The difficulty is that derivation by restriction (unlike extension) requires one to repeat the original type definition contents. If the derivation is in another namespace, then the locals cannot be defined in the original namespace. xan
Received on Wednesday, 18 October 2006 14:23:13 UTC