- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2006 09:47:40 +0100
- To: "Antoli, Leo" <Leo.Antoli@Misys.com>
- Cc: xml-dev@lists.xml.org, xmlschema-dev@w3.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Antoli, Leo writes: > Does it mean that you can't have 2 schemas defining different elements for > the same namespace and then import both from another schema? Not reliably, no -- that is, since some processors may (XSV does) skip 2nd and subsequent schemaLocs on xs:import. > Should everything for a given schema be defined in just one schema file? If > you have a big schema definition for different functional areas, it might be > useful to split the schema in several files so you don't need to import > elements that you won't be using. Perfectly reasonable to split schema doc. for a namespace into pieces. Just create a driver file which xs:includes them all (or a relevant subset), and refer to _that_ file from your xs:import. ht - -- Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh Half-time member of W3C Team 2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440 Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/ [mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFFK14skjnJixAXWBoRAlkCAJ9G9/KlrhIBXkcNGk252t3jxEAtCwCaAhMA dpbHSroZoRI09qm6Jr4EJbM= =VXLF -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Tuesday, 10 October 2006 08:48:01 UTC