- From: Bryan Rasmussen <BRS@itst.dk>
- Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2006 09:14:56 +0200
- To: "Zafar Abbas" <Zafar.Abbas@microsoft.com>
- Cc: <lists@jeffrafter.com>, <xmlschema-dev@w3.org>
Hi Zafar, It was Jeff getting the error. Cheers, Bryan Rasmussen -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- Fra: Zafar Abbas [mailto:Zafar.Abbas@microsoft.com] Sendt: 9. oktober 2006 21:20 Til: Bryan Rasmussen; Xan Gregg Cc: lists@jeffrafter.com; xmlschema-dev@w3.org Emne: RE: SV: SV: Any wildcard and the .NET validator? Bryan, What error do you get when validating it through .NET? And which version of the .NET framework are you using? Thanks, Zafar Abbas -----Original Message----- From: xmlschema-dev-request@w3.org [mailto:xmlschema-dev-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Bryan Rasmussen Sent: Monday, October 09, 2006 6:14 AM To: Xan Gregg Cc: lists@jeffrafter.com; xmlschema-dev@w3.org Subject: SV: SV: SV: Any wildcard and the .NET validator? Oops you're right, I didn't notice that mixed was set to true. In that case I would assume that All validators but .Net are correct in this instance. Cheers, Bryan Rasmussen -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- Fra: Xan Gregg [mailto:xan.gregg@jmp.com] Sendt: 9. oktober 2006 15:10 Til: Bryan Rasmussen Cc: lists@jeffrafter.com; xmlschema-dev@w3.org Emne: Re: SV: SV: Any wildcard and the .NET validator? I don't see what the confusion is. Text nodes are allowed because DescriptionType has mixed=true, and xhtml element nodes are allowed because of the <any> particle. The lax value only means that unrecognized xhtml element nodes won't be assessed for validity, but recognized xhtml element nodes will be assessed. Element nodes in other namespaces (e.g., RDF) are disallowed outright. xan On Oct 9, 2006, at 6:50 AM, Bryan Rasmussen wrote: > Well I think no matter which is right the spec at this point is > unclear > (unless clarified at some other place in the spec in which case it > is just > convoluted) > >> -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- >> Fra: Jeff Rafter >> Til: xmlschema-dev@w3.org >> Emne: Any wildcard and the .NET validator? >> >> Does anyone here have information on the .NET XML Schema validator >> and >> their position on lax validation of wildcards? >> >> i.e.: >> >> <complexType name="DescriptionType" mixed="true"> >> <sequence> >> <any minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded" >> namespace="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" >> processContents="lax"/> >> </sequence> >> </complexType> >> >> <description xmlns:html="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">Blah >> Blah<html:em>blah</html:em>.<html:br/>Blah<html:strong>blah</ >> html:strong> >> blah!</description>
Received on Tuesday, 10 October 2006 07:16:05 UTC