- From: Xan Gregg <xan.gregg@jmp.com>
- Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2006 09:10:03 -0400
- To: "Bryan Rasmussen" <BRS@itst.dk>
- Cc: <lists@jeffrafter.com>, <xmlschema-dev@w3.org>
I don't see what the confusion is. Text nodes are allowed because DescriptionType has mixed=true, and xhtml element nodes are allowed because of the <any> particle. The lax value only means that unrecognized xhtml element nodes won't be assessed for validity, but recognized xhtml element nodes will be assessed. Element nodes in other namespaces (e.g., RDF) are disallowed outright. xan On Oct 9, 2006, at 6:50 AM, Bryan Rasmussen wrote: > Well I think no matter which is right the spec at this point is > unclear > (unless clarified at some other place in the spec in which case it > is just > convoluted) > >> -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- >> Fra: Jeff Rafter >> Til: xmlschema-dev@w3.org >> Emne: Any wildcard and the .NET validator? >> >> Does anyone here have information on the .NET XML Schema validator >> and >> their position on lax validation of wildcards? >> >> i.e.: >> >> <complexType name="DescriptionType" mixed="true"> >> <sequence> >> <any minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded" >> namespace="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" >> processContents="lax"/> >> </sequence> >> </complexType> >> >> <description xmlns:html="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">Blah >> Blah<html:em>blah</html:em>.<html:br/>Blah<html:strong>blah</ >> html:strong> >> blah!</description>
Received on Monday, 9 October 2006 13:10:22 UTC