- From: Mukul Gandhi <gandhi.mukul@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 23:42:58 +0530
- To: "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com>
- Cc: lists@jeffrafter.com, xmlschema-dev@w3c.org
Sorry I didn't mean, if XMLSpy reported something, it will always be correct.
I meant to say ..
(a) could be the answer.
I wish to add that I believe, XMLSpy is a nice product.
On 10/2/06, Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> wrote:
> >
> > I did a quick check with XMLSpy 2006. It reports this as a
> > validation error. So as you say, (a) is the answer.
>
>
> Really, trying out implementations is no way to find out what the spec says.
> The answer is in Schema Part 1 section 3.5.4:
>
> For an attribute information item to be.valid. with respect to an attribute
> use its .normalized value. must match the canonical lexical representation
> of the attribute use's {value constraint} value, if it is present and fixed.
>
> Given <xs:attribute name="foo" type="xs:string" fixed="bar" />, there is an
> attribute use with a {value constraint} that is fixed and has the value
> "bar". The .normalized value. of the attribute information item is "", which
> does not match.
>
> Michael Kay
> http://www.saxonica.com/
--
Regards,
Mukul Gandhi
Received on Monday, 2 October 2006 18:13:08 UTC