- From: Pete Cordell <petexmldev@tech-know-ware.com>
- Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2006 20:01:05 -0000
- To: <ElektonikaMail>
- Cc: <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>, <xmlschema-dev@w3.org>
----- Original Message From: <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com> > The current thinking, at least among many WG members, is that <all> groups > in their current forms are not usually implemented with the sort of FSM's > that would exhibit combinatorial explosion. Given that all groups are > relatively separate from <sequence> and <choice>, there are > implementations in which simple counters can be used to ensure that the > number of elements seen meets the constraint. > > There is also discussion of more general support, in which <all> can be > mixed with <sequence> and <choice>; in that case, we do have to be very > careful to understand the impact on the more general FSM and on > restriction and extension. For those reasons, I personally am nervous > about proposing to mix <all> with other model groups, though we have had > requests from some users. Support for maxOccurs>1 may well make it into > the working drafts for Schema 1.1. Do you have a timetable on when you will be making decisions about <all>? I was contemplating doing an implementation to verify it, but won't have the resource for 2 or 3 week. Pete. -- ============================================= Pete Cordell Tech-Know-Ware Ltd for XML to C++ data binding visit http://www.tech-know-ware.com/lmx (or http://www.xml2cpp.com) ============================================= ----------------------------------------------------------------- The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org> The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/ To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription manager: <http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/index.php>
Received on Thursday, 9 March 2006 20:01:14 UTC