- From: Joe Pallas <pallas@cs.stanford.edu>
- Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2006 09:20:31 -0800
- To: Sandy Gao <sandygao@ca.ibm.com>
- Cc: xmlschema-dev@w3.org
On Feb 3, 2006, at 6:53 AM, Sandy Gao wrote:
>
> > Now, it is certainly the case that ExtendedType's content is
> actually
> > simple, not complex, ...
>
> If you look at the mapping rules for complex types [1] ({content
> type} for <complexContent> with <extension>), it's clear that the
> {content type} of "ExtendedType" is element-only and a particle
> (clause 3.2.3).
>
> [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-xmlschema-1-20041028/#declare-type
Hmm, that's not clear to me. Isn't the effective content empty due
to clause 2.1.1 (and 2.1.5)? That would make the content type the
base type by clause 3.2.1.
joe
Received on Friday, 3 February 2006 17:20:38 UTC