- From: George Cristian Bina <george@sync.ro>
- Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2005 14:52:02 +0300
- To: Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com>
- Cc: 'Eliot Kimber' <ekimber@innodata-isogen.com>, 'xml-schema-dev' <xmlschema-dev@w3.org>
Hi Mike, See my previous post, in this case the content type is the same as the one of the base type - the mixed value on the extended type is actually ignored and the one from the base type is used. Best Regards, George --------------------------------------------------------------------- George Cristian Bina <oXygen/> XML Editor, Schema Editor and XSLT Editor/Debugger http://www.oxygenxml.com Michael Kay wrote: > > >>But I wanted to make sure, because I would have expected the >>value for >>"mixed" to be inherited from the base type for extensions, >>regardless of >>what the nominal default value of the "mixed=" attribute is. > > > I don't think there's anything in the spec that causes the default to be > inherited from the base type. It has to be specified explicitly and it has > to be consistent. That's the XML schema style - like listing all the child > elements again when you define a type by restriction. > > Michael Kay > > >
Received on Friday, 9 September 2005 11:46:21 UTC