- From: Vaughan, Dallas <VAUGHAN@scra.org>
- Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 16:34:15 -0500
- To: "Henry S. Thompson" <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Cc: <xmlschema-dev@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <03642EC064085F4DBB3B40DB5D82F2A2633B90@SCRA_NT1.SCRA.ORG>
Thank you very much. -----Original Message----- From: Henry S. Thompson [mailto:ht@inf.ed.ac.uk] Sent: Wed 11/2/2005 3:29 PM To: Vaughan, Dallas Cc: xmlschema-dev@w3.org Subject: Re: XSV choice validation -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Vaughan, Dallas writes: > When using the online XSV tool at http://www.w3.org/2001/03/webdata/xsv, the following schema did not pass because of a "non-deterministic content model" within the choice element. Here is what didn't pass: > > [ ((a{1,5},b?,c?)|(b{1,5},c?)|c) ] > The output from XSV was: > > "Invalid: non-deterministic content model for type None: {None}:B/{None}:B" > > However, changing the maxOccurs="5" in the first element ("A") to maxOccurs="1" results in a successful validation. > > Is there a faulty algorithm in XSV that decides what is > non-deterministic and what is not? No, but there is a conspiracy between the UPA checking algorithm and the numeric exponent translator which amounts to a bug. Fixed in the next release. Thanks for the reproducable example. ht - -- Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh Half-time member of W3C Team 2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440 Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/ [mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDaSGtkjnJixAXWBoRAoLjAJ0SmTwTK32V36PfptjxzHv3GDM+VACfdnZE jQCo6TvlujRFmTznk6ysdhA= =XrUM -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Wednesday, 2 November 2005 21:37:42 UTC