- From: George Cristian Bina <george@oxygenxml.com>
- Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 17:08:11 +0300
- To: Hämmer Wolfgang <Wolfgang.Haemmer@swx.com>
- Cc: Pete Hendry <peter.hendry@capeclear.com>, ht@inf.ed.ac.uk, xmlschema-dev@w3.org
Hi,
Well, *just as a note*, this is a case that has a direct support in
Relax NG, the anyName nameclass or * in compact syntax:
start =
element root {
element * {
text
& element LocalVariables {
(element l_start { text },
element l_end { text })
| (element l_first { text },
element l_second { text },
element l_third { text })
}
}+
}
or
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<grammar xmlns="http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0"
xmlns:a="http://relaxng.org/ns/compatibility/annotations/1.0"
datatypeLibrary="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-datatypes">
<start>
<element name="root">
<oneOrMore>
<element>
<anyName/>
<interleave>
<text/>
<element name="LocalVariables">
<choice>
<group>
<element
name="l_start"><text/></element>
<element name="l_end"><text/></element>
</group>
<group>
<element
name="l_first"><text/></element>
<element
name="l_second"><text/></element>
<element
name="l_third"><text/></element>
</group>
</choice>
</element>
</interleave>
</element>
</oneOrMore>
</element>
</start>
</grammar>
Best Regards,
George
---------------------------------------------------------------------
George Cristian Bina
<oXygen/> XML Editor, Schema Editor and XSLT Editor/Debugger
http://www.oxygenxml.com
Hämmer Wolfgang wrote:
>
> Salut Pete, Henry, George,
>
> I will follow all the leads you all gave me. This is a great mailing list!!!
> Thanks a lot for your help!
>
> Best regards, Wolf
>
> -----Original Message-----
> *From:* xmlschema-dev-request@w3.org
> [mailto:xmlschema-dev-request@w3.org]*On Behalf Of *Pete Hendry
> *Sent:* Donnerstag, 23. Juni 2005 14:19
> *To:* xmlschema-dev@w3.org
> *Subject:* Re: NewBie Question
>
> The weakness here is that you rely on the sender adding xsi:type to
> the instance to get validation. If you do not control the sender
> then this could be a problem. You will not know whether the parser
> validated each element or not unless you check that xsi:type is
> present on each which would likely mean you have to parse to DOM and
> check each place where this could be present in the instance. That
> is, if you require validation. If you don't then it doesn't matter.
>
> The general problem with this approach is that the schema defines a
> contract on the document. The contract being defined would say that
> any element is allowed but there is no way to say that only elements
> of a specific type are allowed. So the contract being defined is not
> specific enough to use the schema without out-of-band information.
>
> Pete
>
> Henry S. Thompson wrote:
>
>>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>Hash: SHA1
>>
>>Hämmer Wolfgang writes:
>>
>>
>>
>>>I don't know these name in advance.
>>>
>>
>>
>>Another option is to use xsi:type in the instance -- see the XML
>>Schema Primer, particularly section 4.7 [1] (but you don't want to
>>make your type abstract). You'll end up with e.g.
>>
>> <TableDropBanana xsi:type="CommonType">
>> ...
>> <LocalVariables>...</LocalVariables>
>> </TableDropBanana>
>>
>>Ultimate fallback is to use lax validation and give LocalVariables a
>>top-level declaration, and at least it and its contents will get
>>validated properly.
>>
>>ht
>>
>>[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-0/#abstract
>>- --
>> Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
>> Half-time member of W3C Team
>> 2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
>> Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
>> URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
>>[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
>>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
>>
>>iD8DBQFCuotGkjnJixAXWBoRAs4BAJ4+2iHlT3lEMFhfR0pT0cIMyo7UIACfX/Dq
>>tzMWVtQujpdVbNW80MyKPBs=
>>=a61e
>>-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>
>>
>
>
>
> This message is for the named person's use only. It may contain
> confidential, proprietary or legally privileged information. No
> confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission.
> If you receive this message in error, please notify the sender urgently
> and then immediately delete the message and any copies of it from your
> system. Please also immediately destroy any hardcopies of the message.
> You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute, print,
> or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended recipient.
> The sender’s company reserves the right to monitor all e-mail
> communications through their networks. Any views expressed in this
> message are those of the individual sender, except where the message
> states otherwise and the sender is authorised to state them to be the
> views of the sender’s company.
>
Received on Thursday, 23 June 2005 14:05:26 UTC