- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2005 09:55:50 +0100
- To: Bryan Rasmussen <brs@itst.dk>
- Cc: "'xmlschema-dev@w3.org'" <xmlschema-dev@w3.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Bryan Rasmussen writes:
> Does anyone have a good overview of how well substitution groups and
> redefines are supported in various processors. >
Substitution groups are much simple to implement and use correctly
than redefine, so I'd hope that interop was pretty good, but I have no
concrete evidence about this, beyond the lack of email to this or
other lists complaining about specific instances of problems.
ht
- --
Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
Half-time member of W3C Team
2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFCzO4WkjnJixAXWBoRAroQAJ91BaB/K+aXgQXIM3kcl1p1A4jE7gCfd5qM
K9AMp/OYIPiPMNpKxQ1YVKo=
=Y54/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Thursday, 7 July 2005 08:56:00 UTC