- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2005 14:50:32 +0100
- To: "Natarajan Ravi" <Ravi.Natarajan@cfh.nhs.uk>
- Cc: <xmlschema-dev@w3.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Natarajan Ravi" writes:
> I would like to ask whether it is right to have an schema attribute
> definition which is of a union type and also contains a fixed value
> in it declaration.
>
> For example
>
> <xsd:attribute name="test" type="UnionType" fixed="010101010" />
Why wouldn't it be? Seems OK to me, without doing detailed
spec. checking. . .
ht
- --
Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
Half-time member of W3C Team
2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFCy+GokjnJixAXWBoRAthRAJ4y0m6pD2brh9LiOAeTjeMhBag8lACfTzrc
LH2hwnS2+xCTJs/oOgy38Ec=
=rtJr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Wednesday, 6 July 2005 13:50:43 UTC