- From: Bryan Rasmussen <brs@itst.dk>
- Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 12:50:31 +0100
- To: 'Huditsch Roman' <Roman.Huditsch@lexisnexis.at>
- Cc: xmlschema-dev@w3.org
Well when I'm thinking of knocks just bugs aren't necessarily that bad, however bugs that creep in with newer versions strike me as irritating - such as X validates with professional version 3 and doesn't with enterprise edition version 3, or stuff like the following: http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/200410/msg00181.html so it's more like those kinds of negatives that upset me. Although as bugs are concerned I have found some real howlers from time to time. -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- Fra: Huditsch Roman [mailto:Roman.Huditsch@lexisnexis.at] Sendt: 31. januar 2005 12:33 Til: Bryan Rasmussen; xmlschema-dev@w3.org Emne: AW: anyone got good references for knocks against xmlspy As far as I know, there is just a list of resolved bugs, but non listing the open ones.... But if it exists, I would be glad to know, too.... wbr, Roman _______________________________________ Roman Huditsch IT and Electronic Publishing LexisNexis ARD Orac Marxergasse 25 1030 Vienna Austria ph: +43-1-534 52-1514 f: +43-1-534 52-140 e-mail roman.huditsch@lexisnexis.at www.lexisnexis.at > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: xmlschema-dev-request@w3.org > [mailto:xmlschema-dev-request@w3.org] Im Auftrag von Bryan Rasmussen > Gesendet: Montag, 31. Januar 2005 12:19 > An: 'xmlschema-dev@w3.org' > Betreff: anyone got good references for knocks against xmlspy > > > seems like a rude thing to ask but does anyone have any good > references to listing all things found wrong with xmlspy a > propos schema validation? > >
Received on Monday, 31 January 2005 11:52:40 UTC