- From: Jeff Sonstein <jeffs@ariadne.iz.net>
- Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2005 08:46:36 -0500 (EST)
- To: lists@jeffrafter.com
- Cc: xmlschema-dev@w3.org
Jeff Rafter wrote .. > > do I understand this correctly? > > Yes, but why not change it to: > > <xs:complexType name="groupingAndChildrenNodes"> > <xs:choice maxOccurs="unbounded" minOccurs="0"> > <xs:element ref="Anchor"/> > <xs:element ref="Background"/> > [...] > </xs:choice> > </xs:complexType> > > In DTD, your existing model is ((Anchor | Background))* but with the > above change it would be (Anchor | Background)* which has one less step > of indirection. hi Jeff... would this formulation allow me to have for example more than one Anchor in the same groupingAndChildrenNodes?? thanks for the help jeffs -- Jeff Sonstein Assistant Professor Department of Information Technology Rochester Institute of Technology -------------------------------------------- [RIT] http://www.it.rit.edu/~jxs/ [Personal] http://ariadne.iz.net/~jeffs/ [PGP] http://ariadne.iz.net/~jeffs/jeffs.asc [Project] http://xvrml.net/ -------------------------------------------- There are no bugs there are just undocumented features
Received on Saturday, 29 January 2005 13:30:24 UTC