- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 17:48:05 +0000
- To: "Bruno Chatel" <bcha@chadocs.net>
- Cc: <xmlschema-dev@w3.org>
"Bruno Chatel" <bcha@chadocs.net> writes: > Is the following allowed : > > <xs:group name="empty.Grp"> > <xs:choice/> > </xs:group> Yes. > But msxml detect an error : > empty.xsd#/schema[1]/group[position() = 1 and @name = > 'empty.Grp']/choice[1] Empty can be satisfied only if {minOccurs = > 0}. > > What is the correct answer ? MSXML's comment is correct -- such a group can never be satisfied. *But* it's not an error in the schema (document) to have such an unsatisfiable group, so _if_ MSXML is refusing to use it, _that's_ a bug. If on the other hand it's offering that comment when you try to validate an element whose type definition consists of that group, then that's just a helpful comment as to why your instance is being rejected, and there is no bug. The analogy I usually offer is with boolean algebra -- AND with no arguments is true, but OR with no arguments is false. ht -- Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh Half-time member of W3C Team 2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440 Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/ [mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
Received on Friday, 7 January 2005 17:48:08 UTC