- From: Kasimier Buchcik <kbuchcik@4commerce.de>
- Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2004 13:01:39 +0200
- To: <xmlschema-dev@w3.org>
Hi, The dubious XML schema test collection: does it more harm than good? After examining and using The XML schema test collection to be downloaded from [1], some question arose to me: 1. There is only a super tiny subpart of the MS tests defined in the test definition file "testsMS_LTGfmt.xml" - this file is about 33 KB. A test definition file generated form the online HTML pages (e.g. [2]) has has a size of about 1.8 MB and contains 4689 test definitions; so quite a difference. Does this mean that the 33 KB subset is the reliable part of it? ;-) I hope not. 2. Some of the MS tests are obviously not correct; will the incorrect tests be erased, repaired, or at least marked as invalid soon? What about NIST and SUN, are those suites correct? Does a summary about incorrect tests exist? 3. Questions sent to this list, about the state of the test-collection and its incorrect tests have not been answered in the past (e.g. [3 + 4]). 4. A test definition file for the SUN tests is missing. As I think that there is enough confusion about the XML Schema spec itself out there, so it would be nice if at least there was a reliable and complete test collection. [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/05/xmlschema-test-collection.html [2] http://www.w3.org/XML/2001/05/xmlschema-test-collection/result-ms-simpleType.htm [3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xmlschema-dev/2003Nov/0091.html [4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xmlschema-dev/2002Nov/0098.html Greetings, Kasimier
Received on Thursday, 2 September 2004 11:02:09 UTC