- From: Kasimier Buchcik <kbuchcik@4commerce.de>
- Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2004 13:01:39 +0200
- To: <xmlschema-dev@w3.org>
Hi,
The dubious XML schema test collection: does it more harm than good?
After examining and using The XML schema test collection to be
downloaded from [1], some question arose to me:
1. There is only a super tiny subpart of the MS tests defined in the
test definition file "testsMS_LTGfmt.xml" - this file is about 33 KB.
A test definition file generated form the online HTML pages (e.g. [2])
has has a size of about 1.8 MB and contains 4689 test definitions; so
quite a difference.
Does this mean that the 33 KB subset is the reliable part of it?
;-) I hope not.
2. Some of the MS tests are obviously not correct; will the incorrect
tests be erased, repaired, or at least marked as invalid soon?
What about NIST and SUN, are those suites correct? Does a summary
about incorrect tests exist?
3. Questions sent to this list, about the state of the test-collection
and its incorrect tests have not been answered in the past
(e.g. [3 + 4]).
4. A test definition file for the SUN tests is missing.
As I think that there is enough confusion about the XML Schema spec
itself out there, so it would be nice if at least there was a reliable
and complete test collection.
[1] http://www.w3.org/2001/05/xmlschema-test-collection.html
[2]
http://www.w3.org/XML/2001/05/xmlschema-test-collection/result-ms-simpleType.htm
[3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xmlschema-dev/2003Nov/0091.html
[4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xmlschema-dev/2002Nov/0098.html
Greetings,
Kasimier
Received on Thursday, 2 September 2004 11:02:09 UTC