- From: Shane Lauf <srl01@uow.edu.au>
- Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2004 12:24:59 +1000
- To: <xmlschema-dev@w3.org>
I have a question about extending abstract elements with a choice, and maintaining substitutability. Say I have an abstract element myAbstractElement, defined with some child elements which all have minOccurs=0 attributes set. <xsd:sequence> <xsd:element ref="Object1" minOccurs="0"/> <xsd:element ref="Object2" minOccurs="0"/> </xsd:sequence> Is there a way that I can extend/restrict myAbstractElement to another element myConcreteElement, which ends up with a definition semantically equivalent to: <xsd:sequence> <xsd:choice> <xsd:element ref="SpecialObject1"/> <xsd:sequence> <xsd:element ref="Object1" minOccurs="0"/> <xsd:element ref="Object2" minOccurs="0"/> </xsd:sequence> </xsd:choice> </xsd:sequence> - in otherwords, so that myConcreteElement must have one or the other of [the child elements as defined in myAbstractElement i.e. Object1 and Object 2], [a SpecialObject1 child] - and still be substitutable for myAbstractElement? Regards, Shane
Received on Thursday, 2 September 2004 02:26:05 UTC