- From: Nigel Hardy <nwh@aber.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 28 May 2004 11:21:49 +0100
- To: xmlschema-dev@w3.org
- Message-ID: <40B712BD.6050309@aber.ac.uk>
I have the following snippet of schema: <xs:element name="Admin"> <xs:complexType mixed="false"> <xs:sequence> <xs:element ref="UserSet" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="1"/> <xs:element ref="ExperimentSet" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="1"/> </xs:sequence> </xs:complexType> <xs:keyref name="ExperimentAssocRef" refer="UserKey"> <xs:selector xpath="ad:ExperimentSet/ad:Experiment"/> <xs:field xpath="ad:userID"/> <!-- the implementation of ResponsibleFor --> </xs:keyref> </xs:element> All experiments must have a user responsible for them. We can have a set of users with no associated experiments, but I also want the possibility of having an empty Admin element. UserKey is defined over the elements of UserSet. When I set up a test with no experimentSet (but some users in the userSet) that's fine. With a completely empty Admin element I am told there is a "keyref which refers to a key or unique that is out of scope" (using Java Xerces). So I see that when there were just users there were values of UserKey but no Experiment happened to refer to them. I had not expected that when there were no users either I would have a problem that there were no users for experiments not to reference :-) Where am I adrift? Thanks Nigel -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- Nigel Hardy Tel: +44 1970 622 434. http://users.aber.ac.uk/nwh/ Dept. Computer Sci, University of Wales, Aberystwyth, SY23 3DB, UK Adran Cyfrifiadureg, Prifysgol Cymru, Aberystwyth, SY23 3DB, UK
Received on Friday, 28 May 2004 06:13:36 UTC