Re: Problem with types derived from mixed complex types

Henry, 

You are right. It is covered by erratum E1-5 [1].

Thanks

[1] http://www.w3.org/2001/05/xmlschema-errata.html#E1-5
-----------------------------------
Achille Fokoue
Scalable XML Infrastructure
IBM T.J. Watson Research Center

 
To:     Achille Fokoue/Watson/IBM@IBMUS
cc:     xmlschema-dev@w3.org, Tait E Larson/Burlingame/IBM@IBMUS 
Subject:        Re: Problem with types derived from mixed complex types


Achille Fokoue <achille@us.ibm.com> writes:

> It seems that you have forgotten to add an erratum you mentioned in [1] 
to 
> address the problem I reported in [2].
> Without this erratum, the following schema is considered invalid because 

> the spec simply ignores the "mixed" attribute of the 
> complex type restr:

I believe this _has_ been fixed, by E1-?? [1].  Or alternatively see
the mapping for {content type} in 3.4.2 XML Representation of Complex
Type Definitions [2].  Note in particular new clause 2.1.4 and changed
clauses 3.1.2.1 and 3.1.2.2 (the clause numbering is only correct in
[2]).

If you think this doesn't cover the above case, please let me know
ASAP.

ht

[1] http://www.w3.org/2001/05/xmlschema-errata.html#e1-??
[2] 
http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/PER-xmlschema-1-20040318/structures-with-errata.html#declare-type

-- 
 Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of 
Edinburgh
                     Half-time member of W3C Team
    2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
            Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
                   URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged 
spam]