W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xmlschema-dev@w3.org > June 2004

Re: Problem with types derived from mixed complex types

From: Achille Fokoue <achille@us.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2004 09:30:16 -0400
To: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson)
Cc: xmlschema-dev@w3.org, Tait E Larson <telarson@us.ibm.com>
Message-ID: <OF38BB99D1.6BBBD3E0-ON85256EB5.0049E648-85256EB5.004A2E86@us.ibm.com>

You are right. It is covered by erratum E1-5 [1].


[1] http://www.w3.org/2001/05/xmlschema-errata.html#E1-5
Achille Fokoue
Scalable XML Infrastructure
IBM T.J. Watson Research Center

To:     Achille Fokoue/Watson/IBM@IBMUS
cc:     xmlschema-dev@w3.org, Tait E Larson/Burlingame/IBM@IBMUS 
Subject:        Re: Problem with types derived from mixed complex types

Achille Fokoue <achille@us.ibm.com> writes:

> It seems that you have forgotten to add an erratum you mentioned in [1] 
> address the problem I reported in [2].
> Without this erratum, the following schema is considered invalid because 

> the spec simply ignores the "mixed" attribute of the 
> complex type restr:

I believe this _has_ been fixed, by E1-?? [1].  Or alternatively see
the mapping for {content type} in 3.4.2 XML Representation of Complex
Type Definitions [2].  Note in particular new clause 2.1.4 and changed
clauses and (the clause numbering is only correct in

If you think this doesn't cover the above case, please let me know


[1] http://www.w3.org/2001/05/xmlschema-errata.html#e1-??

 Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of 
                     Half-time member of W3C Team
    2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
            Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
                   URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged 
Received on Wednesday, 16 June 2004 09:37:17 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 23:15:22 UTC