- From: <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2004 08:50:28 -0500
- To: Morris Matsa <mmatsa@us.ibm.com>
- Cc: "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com>, xmlschema-dev@w3.org
I'm a little confused about this question. Not only does it look like a
UPA violation, it looks a little bit like the simple examples of UPA
violations that are used to introduce the topic. In DTD terms, this is
like (pongo?, pongo?), except that since we have counting it's (pongo[0-2], pongo[0-2]).
A single pongo matches either the first or the second particle. The
attribution to particles is thus ambiguous for at least one instance. QED.
Is there a subtlety in the example that I am missing? It's true that the
two particles have the same value for {term}, but that doesn't make them
the same particle. Apologies if I'm missing something obvious.
--------------------------------------
Noah Mendelsohn
IBM Corporation
One Rogers Street
Cambridge, MA 02142
1-617-693-4036
--------------------------------------
Received on Thursday, 16 December 2004 14:01:39 UTC